deborah: The management regrets that it was unable to find a Gnomic Utterance that was suitably irrelevant. (gnomic)
I was talking to B tonight, and we were discussing the different forms of privilege the characters in Airborn have:

Matt: Male; Nepotism; beloved of the local powers that be; white; Canadian(-ish)

Kate: Upper-class; Female; Educated; white; Canadian(-ish)

And I pointed out that both of them have the privilege of Player Character Glow. "PC Glow" is a tabletop RPG term used to refer to the forces which benefit characters that matter -- that is, characters played by actual players, instead of non-player characters run by the game master. PC Glow brings together people who have no reason to travel together. It guarantees they'll stumble upon the treasure or will overhear necessary gossip about a conspiracy. It keeps them from attacking or mistrusting the wrong people. And in the case of Matt Cruse and Kate DeVries, it guarantees the rightness of all their choices; that the cloud cats will be their friends; that they'll find a mysterious island; that they'll be given countless opportunities to excel and defeat villains.

B (who needs to go to graduate school simply so that she and I have a reason to write this paper together), started speculating about what forms of privilege are made acceptable by a character having PC Glow. (Perhaps we should call it "Protagonist Glow" when discussing fiction, but how many new literary criticism terms can one humble blogger hope to popularize?) For example, being upper-class, female, and educated often makes one a villain, but in the case of a protagonist, it can make one a spunky contrast to societal norms.

B speculated that, in F&SF, you can be an upper-class female and have that be rescued by PC Glow, but you can't really be a born and bred upper-class male. On the other hand, you can't really be a completely working class female; if you begin as a grease stained blue collar girl, you are likely to discover that you are a Lost Princess. (She then promptly pointed out Laputa: Castle in the Sky as an example of this, in which Pazu remained a grease-stained mechanic but Sheeta discovers she is a Lost Princess.)

...Now I want to speculate about a world in which Dicey Tillerman discovers she is a Lost Princess. MUCH HILARITY WOULD ENSUE.
deborah: Kirkus Reviews: OM NOM NOM BRAINS (kirkus)
I have no objection to present tense narration in any single instance, but oh, my kingdom for a book written in past tense.

Dear authors and publishers: writing everything in the present tense will not give your book the success of Hunger Games. PLEASE STOP.
deborah: Kirkus Reviews: OM NOM NOM BRAINS (kirkus)
My posts have a tendency towards the Fully-Formed Opinion model of essay, but this one is more of a request for you guys to help me formulate my opinions, and my burgeoning discomfort with a new form of exceptionally clever ™ young adult and middle grade fiction.

This post contains one minor spoiler for Adam Rex's Fat Vampire, in that it mentions where one scene takes place. Comments may well contain more substantive spoilers. )
deborah: the Library of Congress cataloging numbers for children's literature, technology, and library science (Default)
I'd probably not have leapt to read Justine Larbalestier's Liar so fast if not for the cover kerfuffle, so I suppose I should be grateful for it. But I am frustrated at how many expectations of the book I had because of various information revealed during the brouhaha. The book premise, packaging (with either US cover), and characterization set me up for an entirely different story, and many of the narrative's reveals might have come differently to me had I not been reading with expectation in mind.

That being said, I loved the book -- and I can't even talk about the two most interesting reasons it struck me particularly with where I am in my literary interests right now, because the briefest discussion of why it made me so thoughtful will give you the same spoilery experience it gave me, grr argh. Maybe once its nature is more generally known, or more of you have read it. I will go so far as to say that today before and during class we had some interesting discussions about varied types of unreliable narrators, and I will leave it at that.

One thing I can say is that having read it, Melanie Cecka's defense of the original cover rings a lot less true to me. I'm unwilling to attribute bad faith argument to anyone in the industry -- I've never yet met a children's literature person who didn't want to do the right thing -- but I can't imagine how any reading of Liar could leave the heroine's race and nappiness in doubt (or at least, any more in doubt than, say, her age, her gender, or her existence). As it is, the cover's not a great represntation of her, though it's more marketable than a more accurate represntation would be.

Okay, I can't say *nothing*. As unspoilery a comment as I could make it, and really, if you read the same articles I did, no surprises )


Side note: Any class discussion which leads me to make the note "Xander:Willow :: Meg:Charles Wallace" has got to be great, eh?

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Custom Text

Gnomic Utterances. These are traditional, and are set at the head of each section of the Guidebook. The reason for them is lost in the mists of History. They are culled by the Management from a mighty collection of wise sayings probably compiled by a SAGE—probably called Ka’a Orto’o—some centuries before the Tour begins. The Rule is that no Utterance has anything whatsoever to do with the section it precedes. Nor, of course, has it anything to do with Gnomes.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 22nd, 2025 09:23 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios