Graceling!

Sep. 2nd, 2008 03:53 pm
deborah: the Library of Congress cataloging numbers for children's literature, technology, and library science (Default)
[personal profile] deborah
I have weird ethical issues with discussing books in this blog I've reviewed elsewhere. Because I review anonymously (mostly), there's no way to connect my opinions in this blog with opinions that have been published in a review journal; I feel like this is cheating, and gives my opinion double weight. I don't want anyone to think to themselves, "well, I saw two different reviews which thought the plot of Breaking Dawn made perfect sense, and there was nothing Mary-Sueish about Bella in the book's second half at all, so since two different reviewers said it, it's more likely to be true!" (For the record: I did not review Breaking Dawn, and if I had, I wouldn't have said that. But I suppose in the spirit of full disclosure I should add that I did review the other three books in the series.)

Anyway, this all brings me to Kristin Cashore's fabulous debut, Graceling. I keep forgetting that these days there are plenty of reasons I see manuscripts and galleys which have nothing to do with my reviewing the books. I didn't review this book -- in fact, I couldn't have, because the author is a friend of mine. (I know that's not actually considered to be a real ethical dilemma in professional reviewing, but it's an ethical dilemma for me.) But if I had reviewed this book, and I hadn't known Kristin, I would have given it a big fat star*.

I don't think the book is perfect, by any means. There aren't many books I do think are perfect, and offhand I can't think of any. But oh, I got so wrapped up in this heroine, in her choices, in her dilemmas, in this world where there are people and magic powers which aren't just McGuffins. The book is full of BFFs, which is a major pull for me in fiction.

Get, read, love.



* [livejournal.com profile] diceytillerman, I don't think I even realized we still had places in our vocabulary where "fat" could be a positive descriptor!

Date: 2008-09-02 08:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] diceytillerman.livejournal.com
Big fat paycheck?

Big fat hug?

Date: 2008-09-03 12:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] forodwaith.livejournal.com
Heh. I'd seen the starred review of this in PW (which I know wasn't yours!), and put it on my mental TBR list since it sounded right up my alley. Now I'm even more intrigued.

Date: 2008-09-03 04:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jordanwillow.livejournal.com
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Po means "butt" in German.

Date: 2008-09-03 07:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] colorwheel.livejournal.com
my german cousins were sitting in my living room today, looking at graceling and -- giggling.

i assured them it was getting changed for their version.

Date: 2008-09-03 05:17 pm (UTC)

Date: 2008-11-23 06:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] applejcks.livejournal.com
Bought it, read it, LOVED it. Fabulous read. In the meantime while we wait for next year's releases, what other books do you recommend that has a similarly strong heroine?

Custom Text

Gnomic Utterances. These are traditional, and are set at the head of each section of the Guidebook. The reason for them is lost in the mists of History. They are culled by the Management from a mighty collection of wise sayings probably compiled by a SAGE—probably called Ka’a Orto’o—some centuries before the Tour begins. The Rule is that no Utterance has anything whatsoever to do with the section it precedes. Nor, of course, has it anything to do with Gnomes.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 24th, 2025 07:05 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios