Re: Here via metafandom

Date: 2010-11-05 06:04 am (UTC)
lanjelin: Fai from Tsubasa reservoir cronicle (Default)
From: [personal profile] lanjelin
But the text is the object of literary analysis, and all of that extratextual information is not a part of it.

Isn't it, though? Isn't the text a product of the author's mind, and as such almsot impossible to analyse without understanding the author's intent and circumstances? To analyse the purpose of the text, isn't it analysing the purpose of the author?

I would not always understand Kafka, Strindberg, Almqvist, Mann, or Lagerlöf's (sorry for the German/Swedish slant, it's what I've been studying lately) works fully without knowing their intent, and I'd say it's an important part of some of their texts.

In more modern works it's even more relevant, since we're more immediately influenced by them, and often living in the society they describe. Analysing it doesn't mean agreeing with it, surely?
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Custom Text

Gnomic Utterances. These are traditional, and are set at the head of each section of the Guidebook. The reason for them is lost in the mists of History. They are culled by the Management from a mighty collection of wise sayings probably compiled by a SAGE—probably called Ka’a Orto’o—some centuries before the Tour begins. The Rule is that no Utterance has anything whatsoever to do with the section it precedes. Nor, of course, has it anything to do with Gnomes.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 24th, 2025 12:15 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios