Re: Here via metafandom

Date: 2010-11-05 05:35 am (UTC)
deborah: the Library of Congress cataloging numbers for children's literature, technology, and library science (Default)
From: [personal profile] deborah
Authorial intent is irrelevant as far as a literary analysis of the text goes. If what you're analyzing is the difference between an author's stated intent and the effect, then yes, sure, go ahead and do so. But as a literature professor, I am teaching students to analyze the text in hand, and the author's stated intent is not a part of that text.

The book is a cultural artifact which has information outside of the text: the peritext, the marketing context, the mode of delivery to audience (hugely important in highly mediated children's literature), and yes, the author's stated intent. That package is a valid object of cultural critique. But the text is the object of literary analysis, and all of that extratextual information is not a part of it.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Custom Text

Gnomic Utterances. These are traditional, and are set at the head of each section of the Guidebook. The reason for them is lost in the mists of History. They are culled by the Management from a mighty collection of wise sayings probably compiled by a SAGE—probably called Ka’a Orto’o—some centuries before the Tour begins. The Rule is that no Utterance has anything whatsoever to do with the section it precedes. Nor, of course, has it anything to do with Gnomes.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 29th, 2025 08:09 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios