Date: 2009-01-04 05:35 am (UTC)
Wonderful reponse -- I went and read the fillyjonk post you linked to before I came back here and read yours, and bingo, here are the reactions and thoughts *I* had while reading, but written out all intelligent-like!

And honestly, I thought the commenter who said that all the criticism of Twilight by people who hadn't read it reminded her of the conservative religious reaction to Harry Potter had a point, even though she got jumped on for saying it. I'm just highly suspicious of what looks like groupthink in any forum... I don't mean fillyjonk's post, which was not really about bashing Twilight; she was just using Twilight as a particularly salient example to support her point, and she didn't need to have read it to do so effectively. And she was explicitly *not* one of the people moaning about what the hell is wrong with people, omg even *grown women,* who actually like this crap; or how it wouldn't matter except the fact that it's marketed towards impressionable teen girls (won't SOMEONE think of the children??). Hello, missing the point of the post.

Gotta love a good old-fashioned moral panic.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Custom Text

Gnomic Utterances. These are traditional, and are set at the head of each section of the Guidebook. The reason for them is lost in the mists of History. They are culled by the Management from a mighty collection of wise sayings probably compiled by a SAGE—probably called Ka’a Orto’o—some centuries before the Tour begins. The Rule is that no Utterance has anything whatsoever to do with the section it precedes. Nor, of course, has it anything to do with Gnomes.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 23rd, 2025 01:59 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios