Date: 2008-10-22 04:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] forodwaith.livejournal.com
I know another writer (of literary fiction & mysteries) who feels the same way as the OP you're talking about, and equally strongly, to the point where her language about academics is frankly insulting. I just don't understand how knowing someone out there *might* be analyzing your text (there's a LOLdemic in there somewhere) is so problematic.

Seems analogous to the perennial "OMG warn for icky stuff"/"click away, nobody's forcing you to read it!" fandom split in a way, doesn't it?
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.

Profile

deborah: the Library of Congress cataloging numbers for children's literature, technology, and library science (Default)
deborah
Suberic Networks

Most Popular Tags

Custom Text

Gnomic Utterances. These are traditional, and are set at the head of each section of the Guidebook. The reason for them is lost in the mists of History. They are culled by the Management from a mighty collection of wise sayings probably compiled by a SAGE—probably called Ka’a Orto’o—some centuries before the Tour begins. The Rule is that no Utterance has anything whatsoever to do with the section it precedes. Nor, of course, has it anything to do with Gnomes.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 23rd, 2025 01:53 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios