Cultural Appropriation and fandom vs authors & critics
I've just been catching up on a month of old ChildLit messages, and current context is making me notice something unpleasant. When there's an accusation of cultural appropriation in LJ fandom, fans immediately fall on the side of saying "How dare those of you with white privilege tell PoC their claims of having been harmed are false?" Whereas on ChildLit, accusations of cultural appropriation lead to a massive pileup on -- well, pretty much always on Debbie Reese. I don't always agree with Debbie, but the constant claims over there that her understanding of Native appropriation is wrong leave a vile taste in my mouth. Especially when contributors hit multiple bingo squares:
steepholm,
diceytillerman,
fjm, other ChildLitters, am I wrong? I know I'm a month out of date with my reading, but it really seems sketchy, how that conversation usually goes. And it happens again and again. Is fandom really that much more capable of seeing its own white privilege than ChildLit (which I know is not monolithically white any more than fandom is)?
- You're telling us what we can't write!
- You're telling us what we can't read!
- It's just fiction.
- No, it's different when it's a non-Native [in this case Jewish] story that's mistold; that's BAD.
- Isn't it racist to say you need Native clearance to tell this story?
- But the author had anti-racist intentions!
- You say that the characters are portrayed unrealistically as members of their culture, which means you want a sterotypical portrayal, which is racist.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
The isssue I think is that most LJ ers in fandom, even if they are not "academically trained" are by nature critical readers: they veer towards close reading approaches and a demand for authenticity. Furthermore, sf and fantasy are intensely political genres--they often wear their politics on their sleeves--so they both attract and train political thinkers.
On childlit the range of approaches is much more diverse. In some cases it is so attuned to "do kids like it" that I can simply not hold a conversation (because it begins from the idea that all kids are the same and just like them). I landed on a panel like this at the Denver world con and wanted to crawl under the table from embarrassment. This basic position extends out to create all sorts of privilege beginning with white privilege, working through gender (girls are being privileged as readers), class, and on into privileging fiction, and oddly I think this last one is part of the problem, because if one constantly insists that "story" is why kids read, then "the stuff they find out from story" is less important and doesn't have to be checked. In the sf and fantasy world, "the stuff we find out from story" is at least as important as story, and for many readers, more so, so if an author gets it wrong, the reader feels betrayed (as I did with I, Coriander).
And I think I have actually just worked out for myself why we are discussing this so much in sf and fantasy: we aren't more liberal, we are just more "fact" oriented and we want to "know". It makes us more predisposed to listening, even if (with are white privilege) we sometimes balk and become the problem.
This isn't me patting ourselves on the back; a number of outsiders have commented on the way sf fans tend to say thank you if corrected in pronounciation or a matter of fact. We don't get embarrassed and don't see it is a humilation (which has protected me in more than one work context).
no subject
When the ChildLit conversations go towards "do kids like it" I admit I often delete the thread's unread, because like you, I find them so icky in their essentializing of all children as being like the ones the poster knows, whether that group is privileged, white, middle-class girls, or whether it very much is not.
(Definitely I agree with you about American views of what defines "white"; one of the things I have really appreciated about the race discussions in LJ fandom over the last year is that many of the fans of color see Judaism as an Othered position in society and fiction. One of the reasons I got so angry when I was reading over the recent ChildLit posts, though, is that people started playing "my past torment is more important than your past torment", claiming that the Holocaust needed to be respected because it was -- bigger? more bad? -- then the Vermont eugenics project, and just, no. Responsible adults don't play the "my victim of racist history was worse than your victim of racist history" game, or say "the last acceptable prejudice", and when I see Jews doing those things I just want to yell get off my side.)