deborah: the Library of Congress cataloging numbers for children's literature, technology, and library science (Default)
deborah ([personal profile] deborah) wrote 2008-12-16 02:48 pm (UTC)

That makes so much sense. It's tricky with beloved children's texts. A child is unlikely to notice any of the problems. When that now-grown child reader is confronted as an adult with the text's occasional ickyness, I think many people react either with denial ("why are you overreading it! It's just a children's book!"), or fury ("you have betrayed me with your secret theism, CS Lewis! I am going to write my own trilogy in which I kill God, just to show you how much you suck! Nyeah!"). When the reality is the books are likely to be a mixture of good and bad, subversive and hegemonic, complicated and oversimplified, just like everything else in the world.

I see what you are saying about class and the Calormen, and I find it fascinating. On the other hand, the question of race is a more complicated one. I don't think it's racist to say "that particular culture has bad values", but I do think it's racist to construct a culture of a different race in the fiction and give them only stereotyped negative values. (And stereotyped positive values: they value storytelling, as long as they are elaborate stories.)

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org