deborah: the Library of Congress cataloging numbers for children's literature, technology, and library science (Default)
deborah ([personal profile] deborah) wrote2006-07-12 09:45 am
Entry tags:

form and content. Also known as "Deborah is a snob"

So I'm browsing my RSS reader this morning, looking at all my library blogs, when I come across this headline:

Medical Content from Distributed Repositories is Chosen as Most Impactful New Application of Learning Technology Standards for 2006

I admit, I'm having such an experience with the vileness of that sentence that I can't even begin to parse the content. I feel like I should turn this into an insightful post about format and usability and accessibility and how clever content isn't enough if your form doesn't lead people into your content, but really I just want to go off and be sick in a corner about "most impactful".

Oh dear, my dictation software actually has "impactful" in its vocabulary. I weep for our language.

(By the way, I admit I'm a massive hypocrite. I have no problem with all kinds of neologisms: verbing; Buffyisms; Internet vocabulary. But "most impactful" is right up there with "coopetition". I just can't cope.)

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org