deborah: the Library of Congress cataloging numbers for children's literature, technology, and library science (Default)
[personal profile] deborah
So I'm browsing my RSS reader this morning, looking at all my library blogs, when I come across this headline:

Medical Content from Distributed Repositories is Chosen as Most Impactful New Application of Learning Technology Standards for 2006

I admit, I'm having such an experience with the vileness of that sentence that I can't even begin to parse the content. I feel like I should turn this into an insightful post about format and usability and accessibility and how clever content isn't enough if your form doesn't lead people into your content, but really I just want to go off and be sick in a corner about "most impactful".

Oh dear, my dictation software actually has "impactful" in its vocabulary. I weep for our language.

(By the way, I admit I'm a massive hypocrite. I have no problem with all kinds of neologisms: verbing; Buffyisms; Internet vocabulary. But "most impactful" is right up there with "coopetition". I just can't cope.)

Date: 2006-07-12 02:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
May I just say, "Repositories! W00t!"

Date: 2006-07-12 06:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
Nah, I didn't write it.

Date: 2006-07-12 03:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
So let's come up with a better word. Significant? Influential? I'm resisting the urge to recast the sentence entirely's hard.

Date: 2006-07-12 05:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
how do you feel about spaving ( i saw it yesterday for the first time and was instantly annoyed.

otoh, i make up words all the time and plan to do so forever.
Page generated Sep. 23rd, 2017 09:34 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios